Offers

One entry point. Three depths of commitment.

TurboC is structured to force evidence before spend expands. The first decision is whether a workflow deserves a build at all.

Start here

TurboMap

$5k

10 business days · credited to pilot

Diagnostic, baseline, controls, proof plan, and a clear build / no-build recommendation.

Pilot

$20–30k

~30 days · measurable delta by day 14–21

A narrow pilot for one or two workflows where proof is achievable fast and safely.

Ongoing partnership

$7–12k/mo

Managed workflows with optimization + reporting

For teams that already proved ROI and want governance, QA, and monthly performance visibility.

Progression

Diagnose

Earn the right to build.

Prove

Move one metric in a controlled pilot.

Operate

Run governed workflows with monthly ROI accountability.

FAQ

Good. They should. The wrong consultant wants urgency without standards. We want both.

Why $5k before anything?

Because skipping the baseline is how teams waste far more than $5k. TurboMap is the smallest commitment that can still produce a defendable decision.

What if TurboMap says don't build?

That is a valid success case. If the best outcome is avoiding an unnecessary pilot, the diagnostic did its job.

How is this different from a consultant?

TurboC does not stop at a deck. The diagnostic is designed to become the operating logic for a pilot if the data says the workflow deserves one.

Can we skip to the pilot?

No. Each step earns the next. The diagnostic protects your budget, your operators, and your timeline from build-first optimism.

The first problem is not tooling. It's whether the workflow deserves the build. TurboMap answers that in 10 business days.

$5,000 · credited to pilot · no build recommendation without baseline